HOW OLD PRINT HABITS TRIP THE NYT’S DIGITAL PUSH

Internal schisms at The New York Times over the firing of its executive editor Jill Abramson has led to the leakage of a crucial document on Digital Innovation. The document, which was prepared by a high profile team after months of interviews and research, is an invaluable tool kit for the arsenal of anyone interested in Digital Media.

We continue with our learnings from the document.

• The vast majority of The New York Times’ content is still published in the evenings, following the traditional practice of print journalism. This is despite web analytics consistently coming out with the finding that the publication’s digital traffic is busiest early in the morning.
• Again, the newsroom targets ambitious stories for Sundays because on that day the publication has its largest print readership. But online, weekends bring the slowest traffic.
• Coming to the length of stories, the 700-800 word story is considered the sweet spot for print. But print has limited shelf-space, whereas the scarcity economy doesn’t operate online. So why not experiment with more long-form content online?
• The report notes that newsroom leaders spend a lot of time reading stories from other outlets, whereas few are studying their digital strategies, viz., presentation, social presence, search optimization, navigation, and mobile strategy. Even few are looking at the smartphone apps of competitors. The authors found that several stories invited readers to post comments even though the iPhone and iPad apps of the NYT do not allow users to comment!
• The scarcity economy of the limited shelf space of print is affecting digital operations in other ways too. NYT receives quality submissions for Op-Ed articles from hundreds of contributors. But at any given time only a few of them can make it to the print edition. The report notes that many otherwise relevant articles are thus lost merely because the print edition cannot accommodate them. It has, therefore, suggested that these articles may be uploaded to the website where space isn’t a constraint.
• The authors of the report found it amusing that the publication’s content management system, known as Scoop, organizes content in its mobile apps according to web sections, even though the readership of both are different. This can lead to dysfunctions, like when the Business Day columnists, who are a draw with the mobile audience, are organized at the very bottom of the Business Section in the mobile apps just because it is uploaded straight from the web sections. Interestingly, despite this process, graphics made for the NYT’s website still cannot upload to the mobile versions.

While the NYT is saddled with all these legacy print traditions, its competitors are increasingly organizing their operations around digital-first strategies. As Digital First Media said when it announced its Project Unbolt, “Newspapers are still largely print newsrooms with digital operations bolted on”. The authors of the report found this a relevant observation for the digital operations of the NYT as well.

(The series continues. Other installments in this series can be found at the following links: Part 4, Part 2, Part 1)

Internal schisms in The New York Times over the firing of its executive editor Jill Abramson has led to the leakage of a crucial document on Digital Innovation. The document, which was prepared by a high profile team after months of interviews and research, is an invaluable tool kit for the arsenal of anyone interested in Digital Media.

We continue with our learnings from the document.

TRIVIA: NYT DIGITAL OPS
Seven years ago, The New York Times housed its digital and print operations in separate buildings.

The NYT’s mobile app, and its international edition home page, have both failed to gain traction with readers.

The NYT’s content management system is called the Scoop.

The sweet spot for print by convention is the 700-1,100 word story.

Arts and Culture stories were among those that were consistently read, long after their publication dates. On the flipside, these stories are found to be difficult to locate once they are more than a few days old.

The report says The Recommended for You tab of personalized stories for registered website readers is not working properly.

NYT could not create a recipe database because its recipes were not properly tagged. So they invested money to retroactively structure the data.

Again, due to the absence of tagging, NYT is unable to automate the sale of photographs.

Also, the NYT is unable to serve relevant content for mobile users because it doesn’t tag stories with geographic content.

(The series continues. Other installments in this series can be found at the following links: Part 4, Part 3, Part 1)