We Make eCommerce Simple for Small Businesses
  SEOsamraat
  • SEO Home
    • SEO for Corporates >
      • Beat Your Competition With SEO
    • Power Searching
    • Keyword Research
    • SEO Best Practices
    • Types of SEO
    • SEO for Images
    • Optimized Content
    • SEO Tools
    • Webmaster Tools
    • SEO History
    • Future of SEO
    • SEO Basic Consulting
  • Workspace Home
    • Store It All on Drive
    • Move Write with Docs
    • Work with Sheets
    • Collaborate with Slides
    • Win Big Thru Sites
    • Sync Calendars to Meet
    • Get Secure with Vault
    • Get a Quote
  • Online Reputation Home
    • ORM Security
    • ORM Keywords
    • ORM Hiring and Training
    • ORM Legal Landscape
    • ORM Social Media Policy
    • ORM Tools
    • ORM Branding
    • ORM Goals
    • ORM Strategy
  • Blog
  • Digital Products
    • Password Creation Checklist
    • Glossary of ORM Terms

Head to head: bing vs.google-1

13/3/2014

0 Comments

 
We’ve been paying so much attention to Google Search that our treatment of other search engines may not look evenhanded. Competition is good for everyone. At the moment, Bing, Google’s worthy competitor from the Microsoft stable, is lagging behind in market share, but please don’t tell anyone at Microsoft that Bing cannot compete with Google head to head.

Recently, when Satya Nadella took over the CEO of Microsoft some experienced SEO analysts did not forget to point out that Search veterans were now heading Google (Larry Page), Microsoft (Bing), as well as Yahoo (Marissa Meyer). It has not been lost on many that Nadella once headed the unit which oversaw Bing as well.

My money is on Microsoft to invest enough resources on the Bing team that they always remain a close competitor to Google in terms of the quality of the Search results, if not market share. Bing offers plenty of value-added free tools for the searcher, which are not limited to Keyword Research and Webmaster Tools.

Bing also powers Search for Yahoo!, and together with Yahoo!, offers the combined Yahoo!Bing network for PPC advertising on the web. Even the combination doesn’t come anywhere near Google on both organic Search as well as PPC Ads, but still they remain in play as a serious act in town.

DOES BING OFFER SUPERIOR SEARCH?

This brings us to the question: Are there any areas in which Bing offers a Search experience superior to that of Google?

In my limited experience, there are a few.

For instance, Bing offers conversion to bitcoin, though Google doesn’t.

Not sure how relevant it is, but given the popularity graph of bitcoin, I’m guessing Google may soon offer the service.

Picture
Versus
Picture
Anything else? Sure, I noticed that when you search for books, Bing offers a superior experience. For one, it’s possible in Bing to return a results page without the presence of Amazon.com.
Picture
I’ve not seen this happen in Google.

Picture
Also, I noticed that Bing always picks up the average reader rating of a book from Amazon.com and all other booksellers in the results page.
Picture
But I noticed that Google doesn’t pick up the average reader ratings from Amazon.com, though it may do so from other booksellers:
Picture
Are we done? Not yet. I was merely trying to highlight that there are some areas in which Bing Search results could be superior. Let’s continue our research some more in the next post.

e.o.m.

0 Comments

why does ' if you like this, you'll like that' hurt creativity ?

30/1/2014

0 Comments

 
In theory, online search is expected to expose us to new experiences and vistas. There’s no limit to what we can explore and discover. But in practice, people universally restrict themselves to searching for things familiar to them.  People with peculiar preferences and tastes, who were previously shy about openly expressing them, tend to assemble around online water coolers which cater to their interests. Once in the company of the likeminded, the middle ground soon vanishes in the echo chamber where everyone reinforces the increasingly strident voices being raised.

PERSONALISATION MUDDIES THE GAME
The problem of echo chambers is worsened by the personalization route adopted by Search Engines.

Google and other Search Engines now return different search results for the same terms searched by different users. This is because these searches are customized and personalized for the user.  Many critics have raised the valid concern that this personalization is at the cost of creativity.

For instance, if you were to search in Amazon for a book, you will find it recommending other books which you might like. Very rarely would you be surprised by some original recommendation, since the suggested books are often based on data from your previous searches.

Providing a narrow and relevant information environment makes search useful, no doubt. But the absence of randomness can hurt in other ways. Creativity is often given a boost by the introduction of totally random ideas or stimuli. Think about the apple and Isaac Newton!

Eli Pariser argues in the book Filter Bubble that the search for perfect relevance and the kind of serendipity that promotes creativity, push in opposite directions. He says that ‘if you like this, you’ll like that’ can be a useful tool, but it’s not a source for creative ingenuity. Because, “by definition, ingenuity comes from the juxtaposition (placing side by side) of ideas that are far apart, and relevance comes from finding ideas that are similar”.

What is relevant may not always lead you to serendipity or happy chance finding which is foundational for creativity. So let your search lead you to explore new experiences occasionally. There’s the cost of time, no doubt. But you might strike gold once in a while.

0 Comments

WHY ebook search engineS are still tyros?

23/1/2014

0 Comments

 
THERE’S enough room for a vertical search engine for eBooks. The few out there are mostly amateur efforts by individuals. As of now, no big corporation has poured good money into developing one. And for a variety of reasons, including the litigation and uncertainties over Google’s book scanning project, the search engine giant has not gone all out into eBook search and incorporated it as a vertical, just like it has done for flights and hotels, after acquiring or cutting deals with sites offering vertical searches. As of now, Google Books is primarily a source for copyright-free eBooks, and Google Play books are restricted to the Android and iOS platforms.

But that could change in the foreseeable future. In the meanwhile, Amazon’s Kindle Store remains the most powerful eBook store for the simple reason that it stocks almost every eBook available. Not to forget its global reach. Though there are more eBook stores on the industry standard ePub platform, by its sheer heft in the market, Amazon with its Kindle eBooks packs a punch.
All ePub bookstores are search constrained
Barnes and Noble’s eBook store which stocks ePub books with DRM comes next. Kobo, eBookmall, diesel-eBooks, and ebooks.com are the other biggie eBook stores out there. From my experience, all of them have limitations in search. Discovering even eBooks which are available are often a problem. The stores reveal them only after repeated searches, enough to deter all but the most determined. Diesel and eBooks.com have particularly bad in-house search engines.

But by vertical search engine for eBooks, we are primarily referring to search engines specialized in retrieving information about eBooks from all major eBook stores. Basically, here customers are looking out for price comparison, details about formats and devices on which they’re available, etc. There are a handful, and as mentioned before, most of them are amateur efforts.

This post will restrict itself to listing them out. A fuller review of their strengths and weaknesses has to wait for a later post.

These are the eBook search engines which I have come across:

  • ·         Inkmesh  http://inkmesh.com
  • ·         AddAll Ebooks  http://ebooks.addall.com
  • ·         Luzme: http://luzme.com
  • ·         Leatherbound: http://leatherbound.me/

In the next post, I will analyze their pluses and minuses.

0 Comments

WILL web ANALYTICS COS GAIN IF GOOGLE DOES NOT 'PROVIDE FOR'?

16/1/2014

0 Comments

 
THE past year was a tough one for SEO practitioners with Google drastically curtailing information on the keywords used to access websites made available through Google Analytics.
Keywords are still available for AdWords users through the Keyword Planner as well as for Webmasters through the Google Webmaster Tools, but the quality of the keywords returned are not comparable with those returned by Google Analytics. SEO practitioners will surely perfect workarounds to tide over the situation. But what's not discussed much is that the move could end up benefiting internet analytics companies like Hitwise, Comscore, Compete, Quantcast, etc.
The competitive analysis packages by these companies already cost an arm and a length. Now it looks like Google has indirectly made it more lucrative for them to charge for keywords too.
ISPs STILL PACK A PUNCH
Many people think that only search engines have access to the keywords used by searchers on the Web. But consumer connectivity to the Web is provided by the internet service providers (ISPs), and although they're now well past their heydays, the ISPs still pack a punch when it comes to accessing user search data.
Hitwise Global research head Bill Tancer has revealed how the process works through his book Click. He says the company collects search data on 10 million-plus users in the US alone. The company collects it from both ISPs as well as opt-in panels. The break-up is 7.5 million-plus from multiple ISPs across the country, and the remaining from opt-in panels. Opt-in panels are groups of internet users who have agreed to be monitored, and whose demographic details are made available to analytics companies, all for a price.
ISP and opt-in data about usage are updated every day. Search-term data is updated on a weekly basis. Tancer claims data privacy is protected by anonymizing and aggregating data, and by scrubbing search data terms off personally identifiable information. After Edward Snowden’s revelations, all such assurances have to be viewed skeptically.
So with internet analytics companies having access to search data in such a comprehensive manner, surely they have the wherewithal to step in and provide commercial solutions to any dearth of keyword data on account of Google's shift in policy?
Let's wait and see as to who will be the ultimate beneficiaries of Google's move. Will it be rival search engines like Bing? Or will it be these internet analytics companies?

(392 words)

0 Comments

Getting to the bottom of 'how to' queries

7/8/2013

0 Comments

 
More from Bill Tancer's Click. He found out that 'How To' queries represented nearly 3% of all searches in the United States. This was around 2007. The number might have increased by now. At that time it was the most commonly searched phrase in search engines.
Tancer says though 3% may not look like a large number at first blush, it is indeed shockingly high, considering the hundreds of millions of queries that search engines try to answer every day. Just as in searches incorporating New Year resolutions, here too he was able to identify some patterns. For instance, the 'How To' phrasal search coincided with the US school calendar: it peaked in summer, and ebbed during winter vacation and spring break!
In his research into popular 'How To' queries, Tancer found 'How to tie a tie' regularly topping the charts. But when he checked the data for other countries, he found a noticeable difference. In the UK, for instance, it was only the 51st popular 'How To' query. Perhaps that's because ties are part of the attire of schools in the UK, and tying a proper necktie becomes second nature? Tancer wonders.
Tancer continued with his substantial research into the question, and made an effort to group the 'How To' queries. He found that the most prevalent type were the general knowledge 'How To' questions (@57%), followed by queries of a sexual nature (eg. 'How to Kiss') @ 17%. Self-improvement 'How To' queries (eg. 'How to Lose Weight') @12% and searches for illegal activities (eg. 'How to Grow Weed') @ 9.5% brought up the rear.
Here's a list of the top 10 US 'How To' queries unearthed by Tancer:
  1. How to tie a tie
  2. How to have sex
  3. How to kiss
  4. How to lose weight
  5. How to write a resume
  6. How to levitate
  7. How to draw
  8. How to get pregnant
  9. How to make out
  10. How to make a video

Comments are welcome.


0 Comments

    Archives

    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    September 2013
    August 2013
    April 2013

    Author

    I'm Georgy S. Thomas, the chief SEO architect of SEOsamraat. The Searchable site will track interesting developments in the world of Search Engine Optimization, both in India as well as abroad.

    Categories

    All
    30th Annual TED Conference
    A/B Testing
    Adsense
    Adwords
    Aggregation
    Airgapped Computers
    Alex Gawley
    Algorithms
    Amazon
    Andreessen Horowitz
    Andy Conrad
    Astro Teller
    Ben Horowitz
    Bill Gross
    Bing
    Bitcoin
    Boston Dynamics
    Brand Management
    Brin
    Buchheit
    Business Insider
    Cailliau
    Charlie Rose
    Code Messages
    Coders
    Competitive Analysis
    Credit Card
    Crown Jewels
    CSAT
    Cutomers
    Cyberattackers
    Cyber Criminals
    Cybersecurity
    Cyber Security
    Cyber Siberia
    DATA PROTECTION
    David Krane
    DeepMind
    Digital Assassination
    Digital Innovation
    Diversity
    Donkey Kong
    Douglas
    Douglas Edwards
    Doxing
    Driverless Car
    Dunbar Number
    EBook
    Ebooksearch
    Ebookseller
    Ebooksellers
    Ecommerce
    English Auction
    Facebook
    Facebook Page
    Fetch As Google Tool
    Financial Times
    Flat Organization
    Flicker
    Fortune
    Fraudulent Activity
    Generic Names
    Giant Target Corp
    Gmail
    Google
    Google Analytics Tool
    Google Apps
    Google Chauffeur
    Google Maps
    Google Search
    Google Story
    Google X
    GoTo.com
    Greg Boser
    Gregg Steinhafel.
    Guruji.com
    Hackers
    How To Queries
    Huffington Post
    Human Flesh Search Engines
    IBM
    I'm Feeling Lucky
    Incentives
    Internet
    IP Addresses
    Japanese Auction
    Jeff Bezos
    Jeffrey Brewer
    Jill Abramson
    Kellogg’s
    Keyword Research
    Kindle
    Larry
    Larry Page
    Lidar
    LinkedIn
    Links
    Lori Randall Stradtman
    Luck
    Mail
    Malware
    Mark Davis
    Mauboussin
    Michael Mauboussin
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Stable
    Moonshot
    More Than You Know
    Neocortex
    NeXT Computer
    Nicole Perlroth
    NYT
    Nytimes.com
    Online Reputation Management
    Passwords
    Paul Buchheit
    Phishers
    Phrasal Searches
    Planet Google
    Project Loon
    PROPUBLICA
    Puzzles
    QWERTY
    QWERTY VS. DVORAK
    Recommend
    Reconsideration Tool
    Reid Hoffman
    Richard Torrenzano
    Robert Cailliau
    Robin Dunbar
    Satya Nadella
    Scams
    Schaft
    Scoop
    SEARCH ADVERTISING
    Search Engines
    Search Patterns
    Search Queries
    SEO
    Seo Agency
    SEO Analysts
    SERENDIPITY
    Sergey Brin
    Shari Fujii
    Silk Road
    Skill
    Social Networking Sites
    Spam
    Spammy
    Steve Jobs
    STORY MARKETING
    Streetview
    Stross
    Success Equation
    Suspicious Activity
    Systran
    Tell-Tale
    The 20% Doctrine
    The Age Of The Unthinkable
    The Art Of Strategy
    The Atlantic
    THE BANDWAGON EFFECT
    THE DUTCH AUCTION
    The Guardian
    The Legend Of Zelda
    The New York Times
    Think Twice
    Tim Berners-Lee
    Trivia
    Union Public Service Commission
    Uper Mario Bros
    URL
    Venture Capitalist
    Vigilantes
    Webmaster
    Webmaster Tools
    Website Traffic
    Wii
    William Vickery
    Wired Article
    World Wide Web
    WYSIWYG
    Yahoo

    RSS Feed

    View my profile on LinkedIn

About Us
Contact Us
Consult Us Now
Write to Us 
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2022 Proseperity
Photos used under Creative Commons from futureshape, a4gpa, taymtaym, Esparta